Difference between revisions of "Twitter"
From Introduction to Electronic Literature
(Created page with " '''Garfield the Deals Warlock ''' ''@UltimateSithLord '' After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After S...") |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
originality and ownership. With a tool | originality and ownership. With a tool | ||
like Twitter, conceptual accounts | like Twitter, conceptual accounts | ||
| − | like @KimKierkegaard & | + | like ''@KimKierkegaard'' & |
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 14m | ||
| + | ''@pentametron'' are able to utilize the | ||
| + | works and words of others and | ||
| + | transform them into something new, | ||
| + | refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m | ||
| + | artistic. In this way, they connect | ||
| + | to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, | ||
| + | art and therefore even words may not | ||
| + | belong solely to a | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | ||
| + | single entity, which is reflected in | ||
| + | his term ‘image anarchism’ | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | ||
| + | “Image anarchists behave as though | ||
| + | intellectual property is not property at all… | ||
| + | [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated | ||
| + | construct… | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m | ||
| + | ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content | ||
| + | on the Internet exists to be moved from | ||
| + | one place to the next" - Troemel | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m | ||
| + | @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both | ||
| + | take from content that is not | ||
| + | originally their own and thus reflect | ||
| + | this broken idea of intellectual | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m | ||
Revision as of 00:14, 10 October 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord
After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After Social Media,” I began to recognize how
9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m
Replying to @UltimateSithLord
social media has changed the notion of
originality and ownership. With a tool
like Twitter, conceptual accounts
like @KimKierkegaard &
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m
@pentametron are able to utilize the
works and words of others and
transform them into something new,
refreshing, and maybe even literary/
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m
artistic. In this way, they connect
to Troemel’s argument that, with social media,
art and therefore even words may not
belong solely to a
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
single entity, which is reflected in
his term ‘image anarchism’
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
“Image anarchists behave as though
intellectual property is not property at all…
[but rather] a bureaucratically regulated
construct…
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m
...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content
on the Internet exists to be moved from
one place to the next" - Troemel
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m
@KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both
take from content that is not
originally their own and thus reflect
this broken idea of intellectual
|
|
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m