Difference between revisions of "Twitter"

From Introduction to Electronic Literature
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " '''Garfield the Deals Warlock ''' ''@UltimateSithLord '' After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After S...")
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
         originality and ownership. With a tool  
 
         originality and ownership. With a tool  
 
         like Twitter, conceptual accounts  
 
         like Twitter, conceptual accounts  
         like @KimKierkegaard &
+
         like ''@KimKierkegaard'' &
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
        '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 14m
 +
        ''@pentametron'' are able to utilize the
 +
        works and words of others and
 +
        transform them into something new,
 +
        refreshing, and maybe even literary/
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m
 +
      artistic. In this way, they connect
 +
      to Troemel’s argument that, with social media,
 +
      art and therefore even words may not
 +
      belong solely to a
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m
 +
      single entity, which is reflected in
 +
      his term ‘image anarchism’
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m
 +
      “Image anarchists behave as though
 +
      intellectual property is not property at all…
 +
      [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated
 +
      construct…
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m
 +
      ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content
 +
      on the Internet exists to be moved from
 +
      one place to the next" - Troemel
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m
 +
      @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both
 +
      take from content that is not
 +
      originally their own and thus reflect
 +
      this broken idea of intellectual
 +
      |
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m

Revision as of 23:14, 9 October 2017

Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord

 After reading first this week’s collection of 
 Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper 
 “Art After Social Media,” I began to 
 recognize how

9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017


       Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m
       Replying to @UltimateSithLord
       social media has changed the notion of 
       originality and ownership. With a tool 
       like Twitter, conceptual accounts 
       like @KimKierkegaard &
      |
      |
       Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m
       @pentametron are able to utilize the 
       works and words of others and 
       transform them into something new, 
       refreshing, and maybe even literary/
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m
      artistic. In this way, they connect 
      to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, 
      art and therefore even words may not 
      belong solely to a 
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
      single entity, which is reflected in 
      his term ‘image anarchism’
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
      “Image anarchists behave as though 
      intellectual property is not property at all…
      [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated 
      construct…
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m
      ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content 
      on the Internet exists to be moved from 
      one place to the next" - Troemel
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m
      @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both 
      take from content that is not 
      originally their own and thus reflect 
      this broken idea of intellectual 
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m