Difference between revisions of "Twitter"
From Introduction to Electronic Literature
(Created page with " '''Garfield the Deals Warlock ''' ''@UltimateSithLord '' After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After S...") |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
originality and ownership. With a tool | originality and ownership. With a tool | ||
like Twitter, conceptual accounts | like Twitter, conceptual accounts | ||
− | like @KimKierkegaard & | + | like ''@KimKierkegaard'' & |
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 14m | ||
+ | ''@pentametron'' are able to utilize the | ||
+ | works and words of others and | ||
+ | transform them into something new, | ||
+ | refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m | ||
+ | artistic. In this way, they connect | ||
+ | to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, | ||
+ | art and therefore even words may not | ||
+ | belong solely to a | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | ||
+ | single entity, which is reflected in | ||
+ | his term ‘image anarchism’ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | ||
+ | “Image anarchists behave as though | ||
+ | intellectual property is not property at all… | ||
+ | [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated | ||
+ | construct… | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m | ||
+ | ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content | ||
+ | on the Internet exists to be moved from | ||
+ | one place to the next" - Troemel | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m | ||
+ | @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both | ||
+ | take from content that is not | ||
+ | originally their own and thus reflect | ||
+ | this broken idea of intellectual | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m |
Revision as of 23:14, 9 October 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord
After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After Social Media,” I began to recognize how
9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m Replying to @UltimateSithLord social media has changed the notion of originality and ownership. With a tool like Twitter, conceptual accounts like @KimKierkegaard & | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m @pentametron are able to utilize the works and words of others and transform them into something new, refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m artistic. In this way, they connect to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, art and therefore even words may not belong solely to a | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m single entity, which is reflected in his term ‘image anarchism’ | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m “Image anarchists behave as though intellectual property is not property at all… [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated construct… | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content on the Internet exists to be moved from one place to the next" - Troemel | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both take from content that is not originally their own and thus reflect this broken idea of intellectual | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m