Difference between revisions of "Twitter"
From Introduction to Electronic Literature
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
originality and ownership. With a tool | originality and ownership. With a tool | ||
like Twitter, conceptual accounts | like Twitter, conceptual accounts | ||
− | like ''@KimKierkegaard'' & | + | like [https://twitter.com/KimKierkegaard ''@KimKierkegaard''] & |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 14m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 14m | ||
− | ''@pentametron'' are able to utilize the | + | [https://twitter.com/pentametron ''@pentametron''] are able to utilize the |
works and words of others and | works and words of others and | ||
transform them into something new, | transform them into something new, | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m | ||
− | @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both | + | [https://twitter.com/KimKierkegaard ''@KimKierkegaard''] & [https://twitter.com/pentametron ''@pentametron''] both |
take from content that is not | take from content that is not | ||
originally their own and thus reflect | originally their own and thus reflect | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m | ||
+ | property that comes with social media. With | ||
+ | the arrival of this technology and the | ||
+ | internet itself, restrictions have been | ||
+ | abandoned in a | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 5m | ||
+ | world where ‘sharing’ or ‘retweeting’ | ||
+ | has become the new norm. Because of social | ||
+ | media, nothing ever truly belongs to a | ||
+ | singular individual | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 3m | ||
+ | any longer but rather to the internet en masse. |
Revision as of 23:29, 9 October 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord
After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After Social Media,” I began to recognize how
9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m Replying to @UltimateSithLord social media has changed the notion of originality and ownership. With a tool like Twitter, conceptual accounts like @KimKierkegaard & | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m @pentametron are able to utilize the works and words of others and transform them into something new, refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m artistic. In this way, they connect to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, art and therefore even words may not belong solely to a | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m single entity, which is reflected in his term ‘image anarchism’ | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m “Image anarchists behave as though intellectual property is not property at all… [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated construct… | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content on the Internet exists to be moved from one place to the next" - Troemel | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both take from content that is not originally their own and thus reflect this broken idea of intellectual | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m property that comes with social media. With the arrival of this technology and the internet itself, restrictions have been abandoned in a | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 5m world where ‘sharing’ or ‘retweeting’ has become the new norm. Because of social media, nothing ever truly belongs to a singular individual | | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 3m any longer but rather to the internet en masse.