Difference between revisions of "Twitter"

From Introduction to Electronic Literature
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
         transform them into something new,  
 
         transform them into something new,  
 
         refreshing, and maybe even literary/
 
         refreshing, and maybe even literary/
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m
Line 31: Line 30:
 
       art and therefore even words may not  
 
       art and therefore even words may not  
 
       belong solely to a  
 
       belong solely to a  
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m
 
       single entity, which is reflected in  
 
       single entity, which is reflected in  
 
       his term ‘image anarchism’
 
       his term ‘image anarchism’
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m
Line 43: Line 40:
 
       [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated  
 
       [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated  
 
       construct…
 
       construct…
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m
Line 49: Line 45:
 
       on the Internet exists to be moved from  
 
       on the Internet exists to be moved from  
 
       one place to the next" - Troemel
 
       one place to the next" - Troemel
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m
Line 56: Line 51:
 
       originally their own and thus reflect  
 
       originally their own and thus reflect  
 
       this broken idea of intellectual  
 
       this broken idea of intellectual  
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m
Line 63: Line 57:
 
       internet itself, restrictions have been  
 
       internet itself, restrictions have been  
 
       abandoned in a  
 
       abandoned in a  
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 5m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 5m
Line 70: Line 63:
 
       media, nothing ever truly belongs to a  
 
       media, nothing ever truly belongs to a  
 
       singular individual  
 
       singular individual  
      |
 
 
       |
 
       |
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 3m
 
       '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 3m
 
       any longer but rather to the internet en masse.
 
       any longer but rather to the internet en masse.
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 2m
 +
      in closing, since I’m referencing
 +
      [https://twitter.com/thezonecast @TheZoneCast] w/ my name,
 +
      I'll quote this for fun:
 +
      |
 +
      '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 1m
 +
      “FANTASY COSTCO, WHERE ALL YOUR
 +
      DREAMS COME TRUE! GOT A DEAL FOR YOU!”

Revision as of 23:58, 9 October 2017

Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord

 After reading first this week’s collection of 
 Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper 
 “Art After Social Media,” I began to 
 recognize how

9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017


       Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m
       Replying to @UltimateSithLord
       social media has changed the notion of 
       originality and ownership. With a tool 
       like Twitter, conceptual accounts 
       like @KimKierkegaard &
      |
       Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m
       @pentametron are able to utilize the 
       works and words of others and 
       transform them into something new, 
       refreshing, and maybe even literary/
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m
      artistic. In this way, they connect 
      to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, 
      art and therefore even words may not 
      belong solely to a 
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
      single entity, which is reflected in 
      his term ‘image anarchism’
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
      “Image anarchists behave as though 
      intellectual property is not property at all…
      [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated 
      construct…
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m
      ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content 
      on the Internet exists to be moved from 
      one place to the next" - Troemel
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m
      @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both 
      take from content that is not 
      originally their own and thus reflect 
      this broken idea of intellectual 
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m
      property that comes with social media. With 
      the arrival of this technology and the 
      internet itself, restrictions have been 
      abandoned in a 
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 5m
      world where ‘sharing’ or ‘retweeting’ 
      has become the new norm. Because of social 
      media, nothing ever truly belongs to a 
      singular individual 
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 3m
      any longer but rather to the internet en masse.
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 2m
      in closing, since I’m referencing 
      @TheZoneCast w/ my name, 
      I'll quote this for fun: 
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 1m
      “FANTASY COSTCO, WHERE ALL YOUR 
      DREAMS COME TRUE! GOT A DEAL FOR YOU!”