Difference between revisions of "Twitter"
From Introduction to Electronic Literature
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
transform them into something new, | transform them into something new, | ||
refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 13m | ||
Line 31: | Line 30: | ||
art and therefore even words may not | art and therefore even words may not | ||
belong solely to a | belong solely to a | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | ||
single entity, which is reflected in | single entity, which is reflected in | ||
his term ‘image anarchism’ | his term ‘image anarchism’ | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 11m | ||
Line 43: | Line 40: | ||
[but rather] a bureaucratically regulated | [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated | ||
construct… | construct… | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 10m | ||
Line 49: | Line 45: | ||
on the Internet exists to be moved from | on the Internet exists to be moved from | ||
one place to the next" - Troemel | one place to the next" - Troemel | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 8m | ||
Line 56: | Line 51: | ||
originally their own and thus reflect | originally their own and thus reflect | ||
this broken idea of intellectual | this broken idea of intellectual | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 7m | ||
Line 63: | Line 57: | ||
internet itself, restrictions have been | internet itself, restrictions have been | ||
abandoned in a | abandoned in a | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 5m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 5m | ||
Line 70: | Line 63: | ||
media, nothing ever truly belongs to a | media, nothing ever truly belongs to a | ||
singular individual | singular individual | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
'''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 3m | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 3m | ||
any longer but rather to the internet en masse. | any longer but rather to the internet en masse. | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 2m | ||
+ | in closing, since I’m referencing | ||
+ | [https://twitter.com/thezonecast @TheZoneCast] w/ my name, | ||
+ | I'll quote this for fun: | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | '''Garfield the Deals Warlock''' ''@UltimateSithLord'' - 1m | ||
+ | “FANTASY COSTCO, WHERE ALL YOUR | ||
+ | DREAMS COME TRUE! GOT A DEAL FOR YOU!” |
Revision as of 23:58, 9 October 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord
After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After Social Media,” I began to recognize how
9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017
Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m Replying to @UltimateSithLord social media has changed the notion of originality and ownership. With a tool like Twitter, conceptual accounts like @KimKierkegaard & | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m @pentametron are able to utilize the works and words of others and transform them into something new, refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m artistic. In this way, they connect to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, art and therefore even words may not belong solely to a | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m single entity, which is reflected in his term ‘image anarchism’ | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m “Image anarchists behave as though intellectual property is not property at all… [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated construct… | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content on the Internet exists to be moved from one place to the next" - Troemel | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both take from content that is not originally their own and thus reflect this broken idea of intellectual | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m property that comes with social media. With the arrival of this technology and the internet itself, restrictions have been abandoned in a | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 5m world where ‘sharing’ or ‘retweeting’ has become the new norm. Because of social media, nothing ever truly belongs to a singular individual | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 3m any longer but rather to the internet en masse. | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 2m in closing, since I’m referencing @TheZoneCast w/ my name, I'll quote this for fun: | Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 1m “FANTASY COSTCO, WHERE ALL YOUR DREAMS COME TRUE! GOT A DEAL FOR YOU!”