Twitter

From Introduction to Electronic Literature
Revision as of 00:14, 10 October 2017 by Ultimate Sith Lord (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord

 After reading first this week’s collection of 
 Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper 
 “Art After Social Media,” I began to 
 recognize how

9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017


       Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 16m
       Replying to @UltimateSithLord
       social media has changed the notion of 
       originality and ownership. With a tool 
       like Twitter, conceptual accounts 
       like @KimKierkegaard &
      |
      |
       Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 14m
       @pentametron are able to utilize the 
       works and words of others and 
       transform them into something new, 
       refreshing, and maybe even literary/
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 13m
      artistic. In this way, they connect 
      to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, 
      art and therefore even words may not 
      belong solely to a 
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
      single entity, which is reflected in 
      his term ‘image anarchism’
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 11m
      “Image anarchists behave as though 
      intellectual property is not property at all…
      [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated 
      construct…
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 10m
      ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content 
      on the Internet exists to be moved from 
      one place to the next" - Troemel
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 8m
      @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both 
      take from content that is not 
      originally their own and thus reflect 
      this broken idea of intellectual 
      |
      |
      Garfield the Deals Warlock @UltimateSithLord - 7m