From Introduction to Electronic Literature
Revision as of 23:37, 9 October 2017 by Ultimate Sith Lord (Talk | contribs)
Taako Taaco @UltSithLord
After reading first this week’s collection of Twitter posts and then Brad Troemel’s paper “Art After Social Media,” I began to recognize how
9:40 PM - 9 Oct 2017
Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 16m Replying to @UltSithLord social media has changed the notion of originality and ownership. With a tool like Twitter, conceptual accounts like @KimKierkegaard & | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 14m @pentametron are able to utilize the works and words of others and transform them into something new, refreshing, and maybe even literary/ | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 13m artistic. In this way, they connect to Troemel’s argument that, with social media, art and therefore even words may not belong solely to a | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 11m single entity, which is reflected in his term ‘image anarchism’ | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 11m “Image anarchists behave as though intellectual property is not property at all… [but rather] a bureaucratically regulated construct… | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 10m ...Whether "shared" or "reblogged," all content on the Internet exists to be moved from one place to the next" - Troemel | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 8m @KimKierkegaard & @pentametron both take from content that is not originally their own and thus reflect this broken idea of intellectual | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 7m property that comes with social media. With the arrival of this technology and the internet itself, restrictions have been abandoned in a | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 5m world where ‘sharing’ or ‘retweeting’ has become the new norm. Because of social media, nothing ever truly belongs to a singular individual | | Taako Taaco @UltSithLord - 3m any longer but rather to the internet en masse.